<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word on the Street</title>
	<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/07/17/word-on-the-street-4/</link>
	<description>"A fashion picture is a portrait, just as a portrait is a fashion picture." - Irving Penn</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: GM</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/07/17/word-on-the-street-4/#comment-249</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/07/17/word-on-the-street-4/#comment-249</guid>
					<description>Parr, no kidding.  On one hand I'm excited for Parr, but on the other hand I wonder if his work - if he goes about his usual style - will not be too subversive as a LV ad - could his work undercut the brand's earnestness, or possibly vice versa...?  I suspect there will be some smart art direction balancing this out.  I'm interested to see how it's handled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parr, no kidding.  On one hand I&#8217;m excited for Parr, but on the other hand I wonder if his work - if he goes about his usual style - will not be too subversive as a LV ad - could his work undercut the brand&#8217;s earnestness, or possibly vice versa&#8230;?  I suspect there will be some smart art direction balancing this out.  I&#8217;m interested to see how it&#8217;s handled.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
