<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: User-generated Content</title>
	<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/08/31/user-generated-content/</link>
	<description>"A fashion picture is a portrait, just as a portrait is a fashion picture." - Irving Penn</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/08/31/user-generated-content/#comment-388</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/08/31/user-generated-content/#comment-388</guid>
					<description>Oh, and they want your image to promote their product worldwide... for free! Not only do they want you to design their ad so that they can make a buck, and not pay you anything for it, you also cannot resell your work in a way that competes with them. Of course, at that point, it isn't "yours" any more.

Reading their fine print... They may have bought rights to Avedon's image, but he would never have given it away for free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and they want your image to promote their product worldwide&#8230; for free! Not only do they want you to design their ad so that they can make a buck, and not pay you anything for it, you also cannot resell your work in a way that competes with them. Of course, at that point, it isn&#8217;t &#8220;yours&#8221; any more.</p>
<p>Reading their fine print&#8230; They may have bought rights to Avedon&#8217;s image, but he would never have given it away for free!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Graeme Mitchell Photography &#124; Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/08/31/user-generated-content/#comment-376</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/08/31/user-generated-content/#comment-376</guid>
					<description>[...] Photo rep + the mind behind A Visual Society blog has smart post on user generated content and, yet, another premium vodka. See it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Photo rep + the mind behind A Visual Society blog has smart post on user generated content and, yet, another premium vodka. See it here. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mgm</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/08/31/user-generated-content/#comment-372</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/08/31/user-generated-content/#comment-372</guid>
					<description>I'm kinda tired of hearing/reading the words "user generated" relating to anything but this exploitation gets me thinking..... though it's not directly related imho useful art info isn't easily accessible online it often seems like "web 2.0" (another over used slogan" missed most of the art/creative world. I can think of a bunch of tech, business, health, car, and web blogs, sites what have you, to check out on any given day but few focused on creative matters that seem accessible. When I say accesible I mean in design, adoption of new useful web tech and in language. I follow photo news more than anything else but sometimes I hit design blogs or blogs focused and sculpture and the seem almost esoteric and lost in themselves.... it kinda sux. Just saying piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kinda tired of hearing/reading the words &#8220;user generated&#8221; relating to anything but this exploitation gets me thinking&#8230;.. though it&#8217;s not directly related imho useful art info isn&#8217;t easily accessible online it often seems like &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; (another over used slogan&#8221; missed most of the art/creative world. I can think of a bunch of tech, business, health, car, and web blogs, sites what have you, to check out on any given day but few focused on creative matters that seem accessible. When I say accesible I mean in design, adoption of new useful web tech and in language. I follow photo news more than anything else but sometimes I hit design blogs or blogs focused and sculpture and the seem almost esoteric and lost in themselves&#8230;. it kinda sux. Just saying piece.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
