<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The photographer as part of the brand</title>
	<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/</link>
	<description>"A fashion picture is a portrait, just as a portrait is a fashion picture." - Irving Penn</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-879</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-879</guid>
					<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf-8nrEdldg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf-8nrEdldg' rel='nofollow'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf-8nrEdldg</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CK Dexter Haven</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-773</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-773</guid>
					<description>Wasn't Richard Avedon in the Chanel commercial(s) he directed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t Richard Avedon in the Chanel commercial(s) he directed?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-755</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-755</guid>
					<description>Isn't it David LaChapelle who actually charges extra for his name to be used with his work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it David LaChapelle who actually charges extra for his name to be used with his work?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trip</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-747</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-747</guid>
					<description>Couldn't believe it when I saw it. I thought, "is he really a recognizable icon now?" He is to a few of us. I think in the end, for the tv spot, he's just a cool looking dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t believe it when I saw it. I thought, &#8220;is he really a recognizable icon now?&#8221; He is to a few of us. I think in the end, for the tv spot, he&#8217;s just a cool looking dude.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-746</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-746</guid>
					<description>That TV spot is really cool.  I saw it while visiting the family over Thanksgiving (don't own a TV myself).  If anyone has a link to it, please post.  I couldn't seem to find it as of a couple of days ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That TV spot is really cool.  I saw it while visiting the family over Thanksgiving (don&#8217;t own a TV myself).  If anyone has a link to it, please post.  I couldn&#8217;t seem to find it as of a couple of days ago.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-745</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avisualsociety.com/2007/11/27/the-photographer-as-brand/#comment-745</guid>
					<description>not only does he have his sig across the print ads, but he actually IN the tv spot.  i saw it the other night and just as i was thinking 'this looks like a richardson directed ad'....he popped up snapping stills with that terry grin on his face.
classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not only does he have his sig across the print ads, but he actually IN the tv spot.  i saw it the other night and just as i was thinking &#8216;this looks like a richardson directed ad&#8217;&#8230;.he popped up snapping stills with that terry grin on his face.<br />
classic.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
